On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 01:50:39PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:

The test is pretty basic, and exercises UFFDIO_POISON straightforwardly.
We register a region with userfaultfd, in missing fault mode. For each
fault, we either UFFDIO_COPY a zeroed page (odd pages) or UFFDIO_POISON
(even pages). We do this mix to test "something like a real use case",
where guest memory would be some mix of poisoned and non-poisoned pages.

We read each page in the region, and assert that the odd pages are
zeroed as expected, and the even pages yield a SIGBUS as expected.

Why UFFDIO_COPY instead of UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE? Because hugetlb doesn't
support UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE, and we don't want to have special case code.

Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>

Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

-- 
Peter Xu