Re: [PATCH 3/4] Add strict version of vsscanf()

[PATCH 1/4] Rip out simple_strtoll() · Demi Marie Obenour <hidden> · 2023-06-10
[PATCH 2/4] vsscanf(): Return -ERANGE on integer overflow · Demi Marie Obenour <hidden> · 2023-06-10
Re: [PATCH 2/4] vsscanf(): Return -ERANGE on integer overflow · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2023-06-10
Re: [PATCH 2/4] vsscanf(): Return -ERANGE on integer overflow · Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> · 2023-06-10
Re: [PATCH 2/4] vsscanf(): Return -ERANGE on integer overflow · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2023-06-10
[PATCH 3/4] Add strict version of vsscanf() · Demi Marie Obenour <hidden> · 2023-06-10
Re: [PATCH 3/4] Add strict version of vsscanf() · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2023-06-10
[PATCH 4/4] Strict XenStore entry parsing · Demi Marie Obenour <hidden> · 2023-06-10
Re: [PATCH 4/4] Strict XenStore entry parsing · Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> · 2023-06-10
Re: [PATCH 1/4] Rip out simple_strtoll() · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2023-06-10
Re: [PATCH 1/4] Rip out simple_strtoll() · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2023-06-10
Re: [PATCH 1/4] Rip out simple_strtoll() · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2023-06-10
Re: [PATCH 1/4] Rip out simple_strtoll() · Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> · 2023-06-13

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2023-06-10 07:52:24
Also in: lkml, xen-devel

This needs a real commit message explaining what the strict version
does and why, and why we can't just make the normal version more
strict.