Re: [PATCH v7 30/41] x86/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2023-03-09 20:30:02
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: 2023-03-09 20:30:02
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 18:04 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 04:59:52PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:quoted
Ah, I see what you were saying now. It looks like it will work to me if you think it is better stylistically.Yeah, having a function return an error *and* an I/O parameter at the same time is more complicated and error prone instead of when you have a single retval and only input parameters. I'd say.
Yea, I agree it's better this way, and at first I just missed your point. By "if you think it's better", I just meant that if someone told me to do it the other way I wouldn't die on the hill.