[PATCH 19/24] Documentation: tools/rtla: correct spelling
From: Randy Dunlap <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-09 07:15:14
Also in:
lkml
Correct spelling problems for Documentation/tools/rtla/ as reported by codespell. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <redacted> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> --- Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
--- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
+++ b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ and then when the *timerlat* thread was then be used as the starting point of a more fine-grained analysis. Note that **rtla timerlat** was dispatched without changing *timerlat* tracer -threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads hava +threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads have priority *FIFO:95* by default, which is a common priority used by real-time kernel developers to analyze scheduling delays.