Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2022-09-27

Re: [PATCH] overflow: Fix kern-doc markup for functions

From: Bagas Sanjaya <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-27 08:32:18
Also in: linux-hardening, lkml

On 9/27/22 02:47, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h
index 58eb34aa2af9..4b5b3ec91233 100644
--- a/include/linux/overflow.h
+++ b/include/linux/overflow.h
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow)
 	return unlikely(overflow);
 }
 
-/** check_add_overflow() - Calculate addition with overflow checking
+/**
+ * check_add_overflow - Calculate addition with overflow checking
  *
  * @a: first addend
  * @b: second addend
@@ -66,7 +67,8 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow)
 #define check_add_overflow(a, b, d)	\
 	__must_check_overflow(__builtin_add_overflow(a, b, d))
 
-/** check_sub_overflow() - Calculate subtraction with overflow checking
+/**
+ * check_sub_overflow - Calculate subtraction with overflow checking
  *
  * @a: minuend; value to subtract from
  * @b: subtrahend; value to subtract from @a
@@ -81,7 +83,8 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow)
 #define check_sub_overflow(a, b, d)	\
 	__must_check_overflow(__builtin_sub_overflow(a, b, d))
 
-/** check_mul_overflow() - Calculate multiplication with overflow checking
+/**
+ * check_mul_overflow - Calculate multiplication with overflow checking
  *
  * @a: first factor
  * @b: second factor
@@ -96,7 +99,8 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow)
 #define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d)	\
 	__must_check_overflow(__builtin_mul_overflow(a, b, d))
 
-/** check_shl_overflow() - Calculate a left-shifted value and check overflow
+/**
+ * check_shl_overflow - Calculate a left-shifted value and check overflow
  *
  * @a: Value to be shifted
  * @s: How many bits left to shift
@@ -104,15 +108,16 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow)
  *
  * Computes *@d = (@a << @s)
  *
- * Returns true if '*d' cannot hold the result or when 'a << s' doesn't
+ * Returns true if '*@d' cannot hold the result or when '@a << @s' doesn't
  * make sense. Example conditions:
- * - 'a << s' causes bits to be lost when stored in *d.
- * - 's' is garbage (e.g. negative) or so large that the result of
- *   'a << s' is guaranteed to be 0.
- * - 'a' is negative.
- * - 'a << s' sets the sign bit, if any, in '*d'.
  *
- * '*d' will hold the results of the attempted shift, but is not
+ * - '@a << @s' causes bits to be lost when stored in *@d.
+ * - '@s' is garbage (e.g. negative) or so large that the result of
+ *   '@a << @s' is guaranteed to be 0.
+ * - '@a' is negative.
+ * - '@a << @s' sets the sign bit, if any, in '*@d'.
+ *
+ * '*@d' will hold the results of the attempted shift, but is not
  * considered "safe for use" if true is returned.
  */
 #define check_shl_overflow(a, s, d) __must_check_overflow(({		\
@@ -176,7 +181,7 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow)
 			      __same_type(n, T))
 
 /**
- * size_mul() - Calculate size_t multiplication with saturation at SIZE_MAX
+ * size_mul - Calculate size_t multiplication with saturation at SIZE_MAX
  *
  * @factor1: first factor
  * @factor2: second factor
@@ -196,7 +201,7 @@ static inline size_t __must_check size_mul(size_t factor1, size_t factor2)
 }
 
 /**
- * size_add() - Calculate size_t addition with saturation at SIZE_MAX
+ * size_add - Calculate size_t addition with saturation at SIZE_MAX
  *
  * @addend1: first addend
  * @addend2: second addend
@@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static inline size_t __must_check size_add(size_t addend1, size_t addend2)
 }
 
 /**
- * size_sub() - Calculate size_t subtraction with saturation at SIZE_MAX
+ * size_sub - Calculate size_t subtraction with saturation at SIZE_MAX
  *
  * @minuend: value to subtract from
  * @subtrahend: value to subtract from @minuend
@@ -239,7 +244,7 @@ static inline size_t __must_check size_sub(size_t minuend, size_t subtrahend)
 }
 
 /**
- * array_size() - Calculate size of 2-dimensional array.
+ * array_size - Calculate size of 2-dimensional array.
  *
  * @a: dimension one
  * @b: dimension two
@@ -252,7 +257,7 @@ static inline size_t __must_check size_sub(size_t minuend, size_t subtrahend)
 #define array_size(a, b)	size_mul(a, b)
 
 /**
- * array3_size() - Calculate size of 3-dimensional array.
+ * array3_size - Calculate size of 3-dimensional array.
  *
  * @a: dimension one
  * @b: dimension two
@@ -266,8 +271,8 @@ static inline size_t __must_check size_sub(size_t minuend, size_t subtrahend)
 #define array3_size(a, b, c)	size_mul(size_mul(a, b), c)
 
 /**
- * flex_array_size() - Calculate size of a flexible array member
- *                     within an enclosing structure.
+ * flex_array_size - Calculate size of a flexible array member
+ *                   within an enclosing structure.
  *
  * @p: Pointer to the structure.
  * @member: Name of the flexible array member.
@@ -284,7 +289,7 @@ static inline size_t __must_check size_sub(size_t minuend, size_t subtrahend)
 		size_mul(count, sizeof(*(p)->member) + __must_be_array((p)->member)))
 
 /**
- * struct_size() - Calculate size of structure with trailing flexible array.
+ * struct_size - Calculate size of structure with trailing flexible array.
  *
  * @p: Pointer to the structure.
  * @member: Name of the array member.
Hmm...

I can't apply this patch for testing. On what tree (and what commit) this
patch is based on?

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help