On 9/24/22 20:18, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:

On 9/23/22 20:39, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

quoted

quoted

Shouldn't warning like "This documentation isn't in RST format and included
as literal block" be added?

Why?  Who needs that information and what will they do with it?

At least readers will not be surprised with the anomaly...

But anyway, for consistency, I'd like to see these *.txt docs be converted
to proper RST.

I'm pretty sure that Jonathan knows that those files' owner(s) want them
to remain in txt format.

-- 
~Randy