Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation/barriers: Add memory barrier dma_mb()
From: Kefeng Wang <hidden>
Date: 2022-05-20 11:14:43
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 2022/5/20 18:08, Marco Elver wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:15AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:quoted
The memory barrier dma_mb() is introduced by commit a76a37777f2c ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ensure queue is read after updating prod pointer"), which is used to ensure that prior (both reads and writes) accesses to memory by a CPU are ordered w.r.t. a subsequent MMIO write. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <redacted> --- Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt index b12df9137e1c..1eabcc0e4eca 100644 --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt@@ -1894,10 +1894,13 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions: (*) dma_wmb(); (*) dma_rmb(); + (*) dma_mb(); These are for use with consistent memory to guarantee the ordering of writes or reads of shared memory accessible to both the CPU and a - DMA capable device. + DMA capable device, in the case of ensure the prior (both reads and + writes) accesses to memory by a CPU are ordered w.r.t. a subsequent + MMIO write, dma_mb().I think this is out of place; this explanation here is not yet elaborating on either. Elaboration on dma_mb() should go where dma_rmb() and dma_wmb() are explained. Something like this: ------ >8 ------diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt index b12df9137e1c..fb322b6cce70 100644 --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt@@ -1894,6 +1894,7 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions: (*) dma_wmb(); (*) dma_rmb(); + (*) dma_mb(); These are for use with consistent memory to guarantee the ordering of writes or reads of shared memory accessible to both the CPU and a@@ -1925,11 +1926,11 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions: The dma_rmb() allows us guarantee the device has released ownership before we read the data from the descriptor, and the dma_wmb() allows us to guarantee the data is written to the descriptor before the device - can see it now has ownership. Note that, when using writel(), a prior - wmb() is not needed to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes - have completed before writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper - writel_relaxed() does not provide this guarantee and must not be used - here. + can see it now has ownership. The dma_mb() implies both a dma_rmb() and a + dma_wmb(). Note that, when using writel(), a prior wmb() is not needed to + guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes have completed before + writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper writel_relaxed() does not provide + this guarantee and must not be used here. See the subsection "Kernel I/O barrier effects" for more information on relaxed I/O accessors and the Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst file for ------ >8 ------
Thanks, will use above explanation.
Also, now that you're making dma_mb() part of the official API, it might need a generic definition in include/asm-generic/barrier.h, because as-is it's only available in arm64 builds.
Ok, it's good to add the dma_mb() and __dma_mb definition with a separate patch into include/asm-generic/barrier.h.
Thoughts? Thanks, -- Marco .