On 2021/12/15 3:24, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 08:07:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 02:55:25PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
quoted
From: Chen Zhou <redacted>
The lower bounds of crash kernel reservation and crash kernel low
reservation are different, use the consistent value CRASH_ALIGN.
A big WHY is missing here to explain why the lower bound of the
allocation range needs to be 16M and why was 0 wrong?
I asked the same here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210224143547.GB28965@arm.com (local)
IIRC Baoquan said that there is a 1MB reserved for x86 anyway in the
lower part, so that's equivalent in practice to starting from
CRASH_ALIGN.
Anyway, I agree the commit log should describe this.
OK, I will add the description.