Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arm64/cpufeature: Optionally disable MTE via command-line
From: Yee Lee <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-14 08:19:12
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 16:33 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 06:19:29PM +0800, Yee Lee wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 16:30 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:49:53PM +0800, yee.lee@mediatek.com wrote:quoted
From: Yee Lee <redacted> For some low-end devices with limited resources, MTE needs to be optionally disabled to save system costs such as tag memory and firmware controls.I understand the cost of using MTE but I don't fully get what you mean by firmware controls. If the ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.MTE reports that MTE is present, the firmware should have initialised MTE correctly (e.g. tag allocation storage, SCR_EL3.ATA) and not rely on a kernel command line argument that may or may not be present.quoted
This allows ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.MTE to be overridden on its shadow value by giving "arm64.nomte" on cmdline, and to suppress MTE feature. Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Yee Lee <redacted>While this patch appears to disable MTE, I don't think it can fully prevent the access to the allocation tag storage, so the firmware must still initialise it correctly. The issue is that __cpu_setup already configures the MAIR_EL1 register to use Normal Tagged memory for the kernel mapping and SCTLR_EL1.ATA is set. The TCF field is zero, so no tag checking, but I couldn't figure out from the ARM ARM whether this also prevents LDR/STR from attempting to fetch the allocation tags. I think it's only the ATA bit and the MAIR configuration. With this patch, KASAN_HW_TAGS (if configured) won't be used and MTE will not be presented to user applications, if that's what you want, but does not fully disable MTE.As pointed out earlier, the hardware has been verified that still has transaction sending to DRAM due to mair_el1(Normal_tagged) is setup. That means the override in this patch would be incompleted and cannot achieve to avoid undesired hardware confliction by disabling MTE. Do we have other options to delay the configuration on MAIR_EL1 after the override? Or maybe another CONFIG to bypass the init in __cpu_setup?This register is trickier as it may be cached in the TLB (IIRC). I think deferring the setting of SCTLR_EL1.ATA(0) should be sufficient. Can you try the diff I sent in the previous email and confirm that the accesses to the allocation tag storage are blocked?
Yes, the previous diff is already online. In our experiment, with cmdline, "arm64.nomte", cpu_enable_mte() is bypassed and the ATA0 is not set, but the access to tag memory still dispatches. Only as MAIR_EL1 remains MAIR_ATTR_NORMAL, instead of MAIR_ATTR_NORMAL_TAGGED, the access will stop. From the manual, I think ATA only affects TAG instructions like STG, IRG, but not the tag access within normal STR/LDR.