Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2021-12-08

Re: [PATCH 0/7] docs: consolidate sysfs-block into Documentation/ABI/

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-12-08 00:36:21
Also in: linux-block, lkml

On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 01:05:39PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 11:32:45AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
quoted
On 12/1/21 12:45 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
quoted
This series consolidates the documentation for /sys/block/<disk>/queue/
into Documentation/ABI/, where it is supposed to go (as per Greg KH:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/YaXXpEAwVGTLjp1e@kroah.com (local)).

This series also updates MAINTAINERS to associate the block
documentation with the block layer.

This series applies to linux-block/for-next.

Eric Biggers (7):
   docs: sysfs-block: sort alphabetically
   docs: sysfs-block: add contact for nomerges
   docs: sysfs-block: fill in missing documentation from queue-sysfs.rst
   docs: sysfs-block: document stable_writes
   docs: sysfs-block: document virt_boundary_mask
   docs: block: remove queue-sysfs.rst
   MAINTAINERS: add entries for block layer documentation

  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block | 766 ++++++++++++++++++--------
  Documentation/block/index.rst         |   1 -
  Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst   | 321 -----------
  MAINTAINERS                           |   2 +
  4 files changed, 545 insertions(+), 545 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst
How about adding a patch that moves Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block
to Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block? The block layer sysfs ABI is used
widely by user space software and is considered stable.
That would make sense.  I decided not to include it in this patch series since
some of the sysfs-block files were added recently, so may not be as "stable" as
ones that have been around for 18 years, and because about 90% of the sysfs
documentation is in the "testing" directory anyway so it is not unusual.  So I
felt it should be a separate change.

I think these patches should go in first, and then I can send a separate patch
that moves the file to the stable directory, if there is no objection to it.
Since no one has objected and this series hasn't been applied yet, I guess I'll
just go ahead and send out a new series which includes the renaming to stable.

- Eric
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help