Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2021-11-18 08:58:43
Also in:
linux-api, linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2021-11-18 08:58:43
Also in:
linux-api, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:26:30AM +0800, Gang Li wrote:
On 11/17/21 6:10 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:quoted
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:38:28PM +0800, Gang Li wrote:quoted
If those APIs are ok with you, I will send v2 soon. 1. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_THP_DISABLE);It would be (PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE, 1)quoted
2. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_THP_ENABLE);An enable prctl will have the same problems as prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING, 0/1) -- it should have meaning if the numa_balancing sysctl is disabled.quoted
3. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_GET_THP);PR_GET_NUMAB_DISABLEHow about this: 1. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_DEFAULT); //follow global 2. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE); //disable 3. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_ENABLE); //enable
If PR_SET_NUMAB_ENABLE enables numa balancing for a task when kernel.numa_balancing == 0 instead of returning an error then sure.
4. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_GET_NUMAB); PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE/ENABLE can always have meaning whether the numa_balancing sysctl is disabled or not, -- Thanks, Gang Li
-- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs