Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 2 authors, 2021-11-22

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2021-11-18 08:58:43
Also in: linux-api, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:26:30AM +0800, Gang Li wrote:
On 11/17/21 6:10 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:38:28PM +0800, Gang Li wrote:
quoted
If those APIs are ok with you, I will send v2 soon.

1. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_THP_DISABLE);
It would be (PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE, 1)
quoted
2. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_THP_ENABLE);
An enable prctl will have the same problems as
prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING, 0/1) -- it should have
meaning if the numa_balancing sysctl is disabled.
quoted
3. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_GET_THP);
PR_GET_NUMAB_DISABLE
How about this:

1. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_DEFAULT); //follow global
2. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE); //disable
3. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_ENABLE);  //enable
If PR_SET_NUMAB_ENABLE enables numa balancing for a task when
kernel.numa_balancing == 0 instead of returning an error then sure.
4. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_GET_NUMAB);

PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE/ENABLE can always have meaning whether the
numa_balancing sysctl is disabled or not,

-- 
Thanks,
Gang Li
-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help