On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 4:32 PM Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] wrote:

On 11/16/21 2:38 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 03:15:39PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:

quoted

On 11/15/21 2:01 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:09 PM Denis Pauk [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add support by WMI interface provided by Asus for B550/X570 boards:
* PRIME X570-PRO,
* ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO
* ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO
* ROG CROSSHAIR VIII FORMULA
* ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING
* ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
* ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

Add support by WMI interface provided by Asus for X370/X470/
B450/X399 boards:
* ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO,
* PRIME X399-A,
* PRIME X470-PRO,
* ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME,
* ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC),
* ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO,
* ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI),
* ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING
* ROG STRIX B450-E GAMING,
* ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING,
* ROG STRIX B450-I GAMING,
* ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING,
* ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING,
* ROG STRIX X470-I GAMING,
* ROG ZENITH EXTREME,
* ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA.

I have added "ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING" to list of supported boards in
asus_wmi_sensors.

Guenter, what is your plan about this patch series? It seems it
missed, by unknown (?) reason, the v5.16-rc1 (I remember seeing it in
some of your tree branches at some point).

I don't see it in my record. Earlier I was simply waiting for some
Reviewed-by: tags, which I have never seen.

Ah, understood. Thank you for clarifications.

quoted

Looking into the commit log,
I do see:

Signed-off-by: Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Did you and Eugene indeed sign this off, ie did you write it, and
Eugene and Denis signed it off ? If so, the tags are in the wrong order.

I'm not sure I follow. I have helped Denis with the code and according to
Submitting Patches documentation the order should be chronological with the
main author to be first in the list. Here the committer (submitter) is the
same as the original author IIUC. (I can't speak for Eugene, though)

I got the patch from Denis. At the very least, Denis' signature should be
last. It is first.

"...the ordering of Signed-off-by: tags should reflect the
chronological history of the patch insofar as possible, regardless of
whether the author is attributed via From: or Co-developed-by:.
Notably, the last Signed-off-by: must always be that of the developer
submitting the patch."

Okay, "must" obviously takes precedence over the "as possible".

quoted

quoted

On the other side, if the code is ultimately from Denis, with your input,
the tags should be either Acked-by: or Reviewed-by: for both Eugene
and yourself.

I'm fine with either Co-developed-by+SoB or Reviewed-by.

quoted

Note that v11 of this patch series is missing from
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/list/
for some reason.

Hmm... Denis, please check locally how you prepare your patches.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko