Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/8] leds: add support for hardware driven LEDs
From: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-11-09 20:41:00
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-leds, lkml, netdev
From: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-11-09 20:41:00
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-leds, lkml, netdev
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:34:23PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:26:01AM +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote:quoted
Some LEDs can be driven by hardware (for example a LED connected to an ethernet PHY or an ethernet switch can be configured to blink on activity on the network, which in software is done by the netdev trigger). To do such offloading, LED driver must support this and a supported trigger must be used. LED driver should declare the correct blink_mode supported and should set the blink_mode parameter to one of HARDWARE_CONTROLLED or SOFTWARE_HARDWARE_CONTROLLED. The trigger will check this option and fail to activate if the blink_mode is not supported. By default if a LED driver doesn't declare blink_mode, SOFTWARE_CONTROLLED is assumed. The LED must implement 3 main API: - trigger_offload_status(): This asks the LED driver if offload mode is enabled or not. Triggers will check if the offload mode is supported and will be activated accordingly. If the trigger can't run in software mode, return -EOPNOTSUPP as the blinking can't be simulated by software.I don't understand this last part. The LED controller is not implementing software mode, other than providing a method to manually turn the LED on and off. And there is a well defined call for that. If that call is a NULL, it is clear it is not implemented. There is no need to ask the driver. Andrew
You are right I have to remove the last part as it doesn't make sense. We already use blink_mode. Will remove in v4. -- Ansuel