Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Prefer lore.kernel.org and explain Link: tags better
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
Date: 2021-10-13 04:37:30
Also in:
lkml
[sorry, once again I have to sent it a second time, as vger rejected it; thunderbird once again messed for some reason used "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit" then it should have used 8bit; I tried to track this down by sending mails to myself, but then it sets 8bit correctly when needed :-/ ] On 12.10.21 22:03, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Lo! The regression tracking bot I'm working on can automatically mark an entry as resolved, if the commit message of the fix uses a 'Link' tag to the report. Many developers already place them, but it afaics would improve matters to make this more explicit. Especially as I had missed the modified section myself at first, as I simply grepped for 'Link:' and only found an explanation in configure-git.rst. Konstantin after posting v1 suggested to use lore.kernel.org instead or lkml.kernel.org, which made me add a patch to realize this everywhere in the docs. v2: - slightly reword after suggestiones from Konstantin (thx!) - make this a patch series with an preparatory patch that does s!lkml.kernel.org!lore.kernel.org! everywhere in the docs v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7dff33afec555fed0bf033c910ca59f9f19f22f1.1633537634.git.linux@leemhuis.info/ (local) - initial version Ciao, Thorsten Thorsten Leemhuis (2): docs: use the lore redirector everywhereOK, I've applied this one, thanks.
Thx!
quoted
docs: submitting-patches: make section about the Link: tag more explicit
Yeah, totally fine.
There was a comment on this one, so I've not (yet) applied it. FWIW, I, too, have the Link: tags put in automatically when I apply a patch, as Jani described; it's a simple hook in .git/hooks/applypatch-msg. That seems worth mentioning here more than instructions on how to construct the link - I doubt many people do it manually.
Well, that is already explained in Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst afaics -- which is the better place afaics, as that is something maintainers should do, and not something people should do when submitting a patch. Ciao, Thorsten