Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 5 authors, 2021-10-01

Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] mm: add a field to store names for private anonymous memory

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-09-06 17:01:09
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml

On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:18:12PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
On Android we heavily use a set of tools that use an extended version of
the logic covered in Documentation/vm/pagemap.txt to walk all pages mapped
in userspace and slice their usage by process, shared (COW) vs.  unique
mappings, backing, etc.  This can account for real physical memory usage
even in cases like fork without exec (which Android uses heavily to share
as many private COW pages as possible between processes), Kernel SamePage
Merging, and clean zero pages.  It produces a measurement of the pages
that only exist in that process (USS, for unique), and a measurement of
the physical memory usage of that process with the cost of shared pages
being evenly split between processes that share them (PSS).

If all anonymous memory is indistinguishable then figuring out the real
physical memory usage (PSS) of each heap requires either a pagemap walking
tool that can understand the heap debugging of every layer, or for every
layer's heap debugging tools to implement the pagemap walking logic, in
which case it is hard to get a consistent view of memory across the whole
system.

Tracking the information in userspace leads to all sorts of problems.
It either needs to be stored inside the process, which means every
process has to have an API to export its current heap information upon
request, or it has to be stored externally in a filesystem that
somebody needs to clean up on crashes.  It needs to be readable while
the process is still running, so it has to have some sort of
synchronization with every layer of userspace.  Efficiently tracking
the ranges requires reimplementing something like the kernel vma
trees, and linking to it from every layer of userspace.  It requires
more memory, more syscalls, more runtime cost, and more complexity to
separately track regions that the kernel is already tracking.
I understand that the information is currently incoherent, but why is
this the right way to make it coherent?  It would seem more useful to
use something like one of the tracing mechanisms (eg ftrace, LTTng,
whatever the current hotness is in userspace tracing) for the malloc
library to log all the useful information, instead of injecting a subset
of it into the kernel for userspace to read out again.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help