Re: [PATCH V5] mm: compaction: support triggering of proactive compaction by user
From: Vlastimil Babka <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-30 14:47:48
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On 7/30/21 4:46 PM, Charan Teja Kalla wrote:
Thanks Vlastimil!! On 7/30/2021 7:36 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:quoted
quoted
The proactive compaction[1] gets triggered for every 500msec and run compaction on the node for COMPACTION_HPAGE_ORDER (usually order-9) pages based on the value set to sysctl.compaction_proactiveness. Triggering the compaction for every 500msec in search of COMPACTION_HPAGE_ORDER pages is not needed for all applications, especially on the embedded system usecases which may have few MB's of RAM. Enabling the proactive compaction in its state will endup in running almost always on such systems. Other side, proactive compaction can still be very much useful for getting a set of higher order pages in some controllable manner(controlled by using the sysctl.compaction_proactiveness). So, on systems where enabling the proactive compaction always may proove not required, can trigger the same from user space on write to its sysctl interface. As an example, say app launcher decide to launch the memory heavy application which can be launched fast if it gets more higher order pages thus launcher can prepare the system in advance by triggering the proactive compaction from userspace. This triggering of proactive compaction is done on a write to sysctl.compaction_proactiveness by user. [1]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=facdaa917c4d5a376d09d25865f5a863f906234a Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Reddy <redacted>Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <redacted>Thanks for the tag here.
Np.
quoted
quoted
@@ -2895,9 +2920,16 @@ static int kcompactd(void *p) while (!kthread_should_stop()) { unsigned long pflags; + /* + * Avoid the unnecessary wakeup for proactive compaction + * when it is disabled. + */ + if (!sysctl_compaction_proactiveness) + timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;Does this part actually logically belong more to your previous patch that optimized the deferred timeouts?IMO, it won't fit there. Reason is that when user writes sysctl_compaction_proactiveness = 0, it will goes to sleep with MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT. Say now user writes non-zero value to sysctl_compaction_proactiveness then no condition is there to wake it up for proactive compaction, means, it will still be in sleep with MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT.
Good point!
Thus this logic is put in this patch, where, proactive compaction work will be scheduled immediately on switch of proactiveness value from zero to a non-zero.
Agreed. Thanks!
quoted