Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP CAAM-based trusted keys

Hi,

On 20.07.21 21:19, Richard Weinberger wrote:

On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 2:37 PM Ahmad Fatoum [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

Both is possible. If the string starts with "0x" it needs to be decoded to a
128 bit key. Otherwise it has to be a up to 16 byte string.

Fine by me. Looking forward to your patches. :-)

I'm not sure how to proceed.  Should I base my changes on this series
or do you plan to send an updated
version soon?
Maybe it makes also sense to base my DCP patch set on yours.

Trusted Keys maintainers, what do you prefer?

I sent out v3 despite the name (of course forgot that git-send-email -vX is silently
dropped when sending patch files directly..):

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/cover.9fc9298fd9d63553491871d043a18affc2dbc8a8.1626885907.git-series.a.fatoum@pengutronix.de/T/#t (local)

I'd advise you base your changes on the first two patches there as well as the Kconfig fix/enhancement
I sent out separately:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210721160258.7024-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de/T/#u (local)

Those are relevant for you as well and I assume they should be good to be merged even if the
CAAM series turns out to need some more love.

Cheers,
Ahmad


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |