Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] iommu: Do not allow IOMMU passthrough with Secure Launch
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-06-21 21:15:58
Also in:
linux-integrity, linux-iommu, lkml
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:51 AM Ross Philipson [off-list ref] wrote:
On 6/18/21 2:32 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:quoted
On 2021-06-18 17:12, Ross Philipson wrote:quoted
The IOMMU should always be set to default translated type after the PMRs are disabled to protect the MLE from DMA. Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson <redacted> --- drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 5 +++++ drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c index be35284..4f0256d 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ #include <linux/dma-direct.h> #include <linux/crash_dump.h> #include <linux/numa.h> +#include <linux/slaunch.h> #include <asm/irq_remapping.h> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/iommu.h>@@ -2877,6 +2878,10 @@ static bool device_is_rmrr_locked(struct device*dev) */ static int device_def_domain_type(struct device *dev) { + /* Do not allow identity domain when Secure Launch is configured */ + if (slaunch_get_flags() & SL_FLAG_ACTIVE) + return IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;Is this specific to Intel? It seems like it could easily be done commonly like the check for untrusted external devices.It is currently Intel only but that will change. I will look into what you suggest.quoted
quoted
+ if (dev_is_pci(dev)) { struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c index 808ab70d..d49b7dd 100644--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include <linux/property.h> #include <linux/fsl/mc.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/slaunch.h> #include <trace/events/iommu.h> static struct kset *iommu_group_kset;@@ -2761,7 +2762,10 @@ void iommu_set_default_passthrough(bool cmd_line) { if (cmd_line) iommu_cmd_line |= IOMMU_CMD_LINE_DMA_API; - iommu_def_domain_type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY; + + /* Do not allow identity domain when Secure Launch is configured */ + if (!(slaunch_get_flags() & SL_FLAG_ACTIVE)) + iommu_def_domain_type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY;Quietly ignoring the setting and possibly leaving iommu_def_domain_type uninitialised (note that 0 is not actually a usable type) doesn't seem great. AFAICS this probably warrants similar treatment to theOk so I guess it would be better to set it to IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA event though passthrough was requested. Or perhaps something more is needed here?quoted
mem_encrypt_active() case - there doesn't seem a great deal of value in trying to save users from themselves if they care about measured boot yet explicitly pass options which may compromise measured boot. If you really want to go down that route there's at least the sysfs interface you'd need to nobble as well, not to mention the various ways of completely disabling IOMMUs...Doing a secure launch with the kernel is not a general purpose user use case. A lot of work is done to secure the environment. Allowing passthrough mode would leave the secure launch kernel exposed to DMA. I think what we are trying to do here is what we intend though there may be a better way or perhaps it is incomplete as you suggest.
I don't really like all these special cases. Generically, what you're trying to do is (AFAICT) to get the kernel to run in a mode in which it does its best not to trust attached devices. Nothing about this is specific to Secure Launch. There are plenty of scenarios in which this the case: - Virtual devices in a VM host outside the TCB, e.g. VDUSE, Xen device domains (did I get the name right), whatever tricks QEMU has, etc. - SRTM / DRTM technologies (including but not limited to Secure Launch -- plain old Secure Boot can work like this too). - Secure guest technologies, including but not limited to TDX and SEV. - Any computer with a USB-C port or other external DMA-capable port. - Regular computers in which the admin wants to enable this mode for whatever reason. Can you folks all please agree on a coordinated way for a Linux kernel to configure itself appropriately? Or to be configured via initramfs, boot option, or some other trusted source of configuration supplied at boot time? We don't need a whole bunch of if (TDX), if (SEV), if (secure launch), if (I have a USB-C port with PCIe exposed), if (running on Xen), and similar checks all over the place.