On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 4:32 AM Miguel Ojeda
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 1:26 PM Miguel Ojeda
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I am not sure if it is best or not to have the GCC link in order to be
consistent with the rest of the links (they are for the docs only). Do
we know if GCC going to implement it soon?

i.e. if GCC does not implement it yet we use elsewhere this kind of
marker instead:

     * Optional: not supported by gcc

The first of its kind, normally it is clang/icc there ;-)

:^) GCC does have an attribute since GCC 7.1 for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223#c11
I'm moving Clang over to use that in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104658
Once that lands, I'll send a v2 (without carrying any reviewed by tags).

We could nevertheless have the link there, something like:

    * Optional: not supported by GCC
                https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers