Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/slub: Actually fix freelist pointer vs redzoning
flat view
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-08 23:12:24
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml, stable
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 01:56:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 11:39:55 -0700 Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
It turns out that SLUB redzoning ("slub_debug=Z") checks from s->object_size rather than from s->inuse (which is normally bumped to make room for the freelist pointer), so a cache created with an object size less than 24 would have the freelist pointer written beyond s->object_size, causing the redzone to be corrupted by the freelist pointer. This was very visible with "slub_debug=ZF": BUG test (Tainted: G B ): Right Redzone overwritten ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO: 0xffff957ead1c05de-0xffff957ead1c05df @offset=1502. First byte 0x1a instead of 0xbb INFO: Slab 0xffffef3950b47000 objects=170 used=170 fp=0x0000000000000000 flags=0x8000000000000200 INFO: Object 0xffff957ead1c05d8 @offset=1496 fp=0xffff957ead1c0620 Redzone (____ptrval____): bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ........ Object (____ptrval____): 00 00 00 00 00 f6 f4 a5 ........ Redzone (____ptrval____): 40 1d e8 1a aa @.... Padding (____ptrval____): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ Adjust the offset to stay within s->object_size. (Note that no caches of in this size range are known to exist in the kernel currently.)We already have https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6746FEEA-FD69-4792-8DDA-C78F5FE7DA02@psu.edu. Is this patch better?
Yes, I believe so, since it reduces code and corrects the size checking more directly (and more clearly demonstrates the redzone calculation problem in the commit log). -Kees
quoted
--- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c@@ -3689,7 +3689,6 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order) { slab_flags_t flags = s->flags; unsigned int size = s->object_size; - unsigned int freepointer_area; unsigned int order; /*@@ -3698,13 +3697,6 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order) * the possible location of the free pointer. */ size = ALIGN(size, sizeof(void *)); - /* - * This is the area of the object where a freepointer can be - * safely written. If redzoning adds more to the inuse size, we - * can't use that portion for writing the freepointer, so - * s->offset must be limited within this for the general case. - */ - freepointer_area = size; #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG /*@@ -3730,7 +3722,7 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order) /* * With that we have determined the number of bytes in actual use - * by the object. This is the potential offset to the free pointer. + * by the object and redzoning. */ s->inuse = size;@@ -3753,13 +3745,13 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order) */ s->offset = size; size += sizeof(void *); - } else if (freepointer_area > sizeof(void *)) { + } else { /* * Store freelist pointer near middle of object to keep * it away from the edges of the object to avoid small * sized over/underflows from neighboring allocations. */ - s->offset = ALIGN(freepointer_area / 2, sizeof(void *)); + s->offset = ALIGN_DOWN(s->object_size / 2, sizeof(void *)); } #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG-- 2.25.1
-- Kees Cook