Thread (63 messages) 63 messages, 12 authors, 2021-06-16

Re: [PATCH 13/34] docs: dev-tools: testing-overview.rst: avoid using ReSt :doc:`foo` markup

flat view

From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-06-05 16:13:20
Also in: lkml

Em Sat, 5 Jun 2021 23:43:55 +0800
David Gow [off-list ref] escreveu:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:18 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py.
So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
---  
Hmm... I'd originally wanted this to read more like the name of the
tool than the path to the doc file, but given the :doc: prefix and
backticks are equally ugly, and no less confusing to the plain-text
reader than the filename, I'm happy to have this changed. Particularly
if we're standardising on this across the kernel documentation.
Yeah, the idea is to avoid :doc: treewide, at least for simple cases.

I'm proposing that we should still keep using:

	:doc:`some description <foo>`

for named references, which is still ugly in plain-text, but can be
used to provide a better hyperlink when the docs are converted
into html/LaTeX/pdf, as it would be converted (in html) as:

	<a href="foo.html">some description</a>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <redacted>
Thanks!
Mauro

-- David
quoted
 Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
index b5b46709969c..65feb81edb14 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
@@ -71,15 +71,15 @@ can be used to verify that a test is executing particular functions or lines
 of code. This is useful for determining how much of the kernel is being tested,
 and for finding corner-cases which are not covered by the appropriate test.

-:doc:`gcov` is GCC's coverage testing tool, which can be used with the kernel
-to get global or per-module coverage. Unlike KCOV, it does not record per-task
-coverage. Coverage data can be read from debugfs, and interpreted using the
-usual gcov tooling.
+Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst is GCC's coverage testing tool, which can be
+used with the kernel to get global or per-module coverage. Unlike KCOV, it
+does not record per-task coverage. Coverage data can be read from debugfs,
+and interpreted using the usual gcov tooling.

-:doc:`kcov` is a feature which can be built in to the kernel to allow
-capturing coverage on a per-task level. It's therefore useful for fuzzing and
-other situations where information about code executed during, for example, a
-single syscall is useful.
+Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst is a feature which can be built in to the
+kernel to allow capturing coverage on a per-task level. It's therefore useful
+for fuzzing and other situations where information about code executed during,
+for example, a single syscall is useful.


 Dynamic Analysis Tools
--
2.31.1
 


Thanks,
Mauro
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help