Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 4 authors, 2021-05-10

Re: [PATCH stable 5.10 0/3] ARM FDT relocation backports

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-10 09:37:18
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml, stable

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:43 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 06:22:05PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted
This does not qualify as a regression in that it has never worked for
the specific platform that I have shown above until your 3 commits came
in and fixed that particular FDT placement. To me this qualifies as a
bug fix, and given that the 3 (now 4) commits applied without hunks, it
seems reasonable to me to back port those to stable.
As this isn't a regression, why not just use 5.12 on these platforms?
Why is 5.4 and 5.10 needed?
Actually I think it *is* a regression, but not a common one. The bug that
Ard is fixing can appear when the kernel grows over a certain size.

If a user compile in a new set of functionality and the kernel size
reach a tripping point so that the DTB ends up just outside the 1:1
lowmem map, disaster strikes.

This has been a long standing mysterious bug for people using
attached device trees.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help