Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2021-05-13

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection

From: Beata Michalska <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-13 14:02:11
Also in: lkml

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 03:59:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Beata Michalska wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Where:
 arch_scale_cpu_capacity(L) = 512
 arch_scale_cpu_capacity(M) = 871
 arch_scale_cpu_capacity(B) = 1024
Low, High
Small, Big

But you appear to have picked: Low and Big, which just doesn't make any
sense. (Worse, L can also be Large :-)
(L)ittle, (M)edium, (B)ig
I can re-arrange the abbreviations used here.
Duh, I must really be having a bad day for not thinking of Little. I
don't think you need to change this. S,M,L would be like a clothing
store, but steps away from the big.Little thing.
That's how I would prefer it - keep the 'little' things
Thanks

---
BR
B.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help