On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 04:29:55PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote:

po 26. 4. 2021 v 16:18 odesílatel Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] napsal:

quoted

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:46:27PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote:

quoted

Hello.

I'm sending a new version of my patch on max31790. This new version
fixes the cache issue and actually makes it work by setting
.cache_type. You were right about the "yes/no" ranges, so I flipped
those.

By the way, it seems that the reason your reply got lost is because of
weird addresses in the "Cc:" email field, they end with "cesnet.cz",
so it could be that I'm sending email incorrectly. Let me know if I'm
doing something wrong.

Yes, the To: field of your series is either empty (for the first patch
of the series), or it is something like:
        To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <;

Also, you send your follow-up series as response of the previous series
which doesn't follow the guidance for submitting patches and may result
in the entire series getting lost.

Sorry, I will fix my email-sending procedure. Should I resend the
patch series without the In-Reply-To field?

No, just keep it in mind for next time.

Thanks,
Guenter