Thread (31 messages) flat view 31 messages, 4 authors, 2021-04-10

Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 00/15] Improve BPF syscall command documentation

From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-05 02:51:50
Also in: bpf, linux-man

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:20 AM Joe Stringer [off-list ref] wrote:
Rather than tackle everything at once, I have focused in this series on
the syscall commands, "enum bpf_cmd".
...
The eventual goal of this effort would be to extend the kernel UAPI
headers such that each of the categories I had listed above (commands,
maps, progs, hooks) have dedicated documentation in the kernel tree, and
that developers must update the comments in the headers to document the
APIs prior to patch acceptance, and that we could auto-generate the
latest version of the bpf(2) manual pages based on a few static
description sections combined with the dynamically-generated output from
the header.
v2:
* Remove build infrastructure in favor of kernel-doc directives
* Shift userspace-api docs under Documentation/userspace-api/ebpf
* Fix scripts/bpf_doc.py syscall --header (throw unsupported error)
* Improve .gitignore handling of newly autogenerated files
Looks great. Applied. Thanks!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help