Em Mon, 1 Mar 2021 13:27:39 +0100
Hans Verkuil [off-list ref] escreveu:

Hi Mauro,

Thanks for your review. I'm addressing the points on a v5.

Yet, there's one that, IMHO, we should elaborate more, if we add it to the
doc:

quoted

+Provided that your patch is at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org, it should
+be sooner or later handled, so you don't need to re-submit a patch.
+
+Except for bug fixes, we don't usually add new patches to the development
+tree between -rc6 and the next -rc1.
+
+Please notice that the media subsystem is a high traffic one, so it
+could take a while for us to be able to review your patches. Feel free
+to ping if you don't get a feedback in a couple of weeks or to ask
+other developers to publicly add Reviewed-by and, more importantly,
+Tested-by tags.  

What I have noticed is that sometimes important bug fixes are missed due
to the high traffic volume. I would like to see something along the lines of:

"If important bug fixes are not reviewed or picked up within a week of posting,
then do not hesitate to ping."

I see your point, but "important" is relative ;-) I mean, a bug
is almost always important for the one reporting it. It doesn't
necessarily means that such bug is visible by others or if the
subsystem's core has a serious bug.

IMO, if we add a paragraph like that, we should better explain what
"important" means.

Thanks,
Mauro