Re: [PATCH v20 21/25] x86/cet/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-11 02:07:41
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-11 02:07:41
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:38:10PM -0800, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
On 2/10/2021 11:58 AM, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:56:59AM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:quoted
To deliver a signal, create a shadow stack restore token and put the token and the signal restorer address on the shadow stack. For sigreturn, verify the token and restore from it the shadow stack pointer. A shadow stack restore token marks a restore point of the shadow stack. The token is distinctively different from any shadow stack address.How is it different? It seems like it just has the last 2 bits masked/set?For example, for 64-bit apps, A shadow stack pointer value (*ssp) has to be in some code area, but for a token, (*ptr_of_token) = (ptr_of_token + 8), which has to be within the same shadow stack area. In cet_verify_rstor_token(), this is checked.quoted
quoted
In sigreturn, restoring from a token ensures the target address is the location pointed by the token.As in, a token (real stack address with 2-bit mask) is checked against the real stack address? I don't see a comparison -- it only checks that it is < TASK_SIZE. How does cet_restore_signal() figure into this? (As in, the MSR writes?)The kernel takes the restore address from the token. It will not mistakenly take a wrong address from the shadow stack. I will put this in my commit logs.
Ah-ha, okay, got it now. Thank you! Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <redacted> -- Kees Cook