Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] of: property: Add fw_devlink support for optional properties
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-02-10 08:28:15
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-pm, lkml
Hi Saravana, CC iommu On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:55 PM Saravana Kannan [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:33 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:26:40PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:quoted
Not all DT bindings are mandatory bindings. Add support for optional DT bindings and mark iommus, iommu-map, dmas as optional DT bindings.I don't think we can say these are optional or not. It's got to be a driver decision somehow.Right, so maybe the word "optional" isn't a good name for it. I can change that if you want. The point being, fw_devlink can't block the probe of this driver based on iommu property. We let the driver decide if it wants to -EPROBE_DEFER or not or however it wants to handle this.
The driver cannot make that decision, cfr. below.
quoted
For example, if IOMMU is optional, what happens with this sequence: driver probes without IOMMU driver calls dma_map_?() IOMMU driver probes h/w accesses DMA buffer --> BOOM!
Does it really behave that way? Or does it continue without IOMMU?
Right. But how is this really related to fw_devlink? AFAICT, this is an issue even today. If the driver needs the IOMMU, then it needs to make sure the IOMMU has probed? What am I missing?
Individual I/O (IOMMU slave) drivers are completely unaware of the
presence or absence of an IOMMU; they just use the DMA API, which is the
same regardless of an IOMMU being used or not.
While for GPIO/IRQ/CLK/DMA/... have request/get_{gpio,irq,clk,dma,...}
APIs for a driver to get a reference, which can return -EPROBE_DEFER, no
such thing exists for IOMMUs. This is handled by the IOMMU core
instead.
Using the IOMMU or not is more like a system policy decision.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds