On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:11:45 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:

On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:29:24 -0800 Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:35:50 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:  

quoted

On Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:36:30 +1100 NeilBrown [off-list ref] wrote:
1f4aace60b0e ("fs/seq_file.c: simplify seq_file iteration code and
interface") was August 2018, so I don't think "recent" applies here?

I didn't look closely, but it appears that the sctp procfs file is
world-readable.  So we gave unprivileged userspace the ability to leak
kernel memory?

So I'm thinking that we aim for 5.12-rc1 on all three patches with a cc:stable?  

I'd rather take the sctp patch sooner, we'll send another batch 
of networking fixes for 5.11, anyway. Would that be okay with you?  

Sure.

Applied patch 3 to net, thanks everyone!