Re: [PATCH v19 08/25] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_COW
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-04 20:30:56
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-04 20:30:56
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
On 2/4/21 12:19 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
(e) A page where the processor observed a Write=1 PTE, started a write, set Dirty=1, but then observed a Write=0 PTE. That's possible today, but will not happen on processors that support shadow stack.What happens for "e" with/without CET? It sounds like direct writes to such pages will be (correctly) rejected by the MMU?
A page fault would be generated regardless of CET support. If CET were not around, the fault would be reported as a present, write fault. If this happened and CET were around (which shouldn't happen in practice, it means we have a hardware issue) a page fault exception is generated. Yu-cheng, I'm not sure there's enough debugging around to tell us if this happens. Would we even notice?