Hi Chen,
On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 15:10 +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Introduce macro CRASH_ALIGN for alignment, macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX
for upper bound of low crash memory, macro CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX for
upper bound of high crash memory, use macroes instead.
Besides, keep consistent with x86, use CRASH_ALIGN as the lower bound
of crash kernel reservation.
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <redacted>
Tested-by: John Donnelly <redacted>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h | 6 ++++++
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
index d24b527e8c00..3f6ecae0bc68 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
#define KEXEC_ARCH KEXEC_ARCH_AARCH64
+/* 2M alignment for crash kernel regions */
+#define CRASH_ALIGN SZ_2M
+
+#define CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX arm64_dma_phys_limit
I wonder if you could use 'ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT', instead of creating a new
define.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+#define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
+
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
/**
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 709d98fea90c..912f64f505f7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
if (crash_base == 0) {
/* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
- crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, arm64_dma_phys_limit,
- crash_size, SZ_2M);
+ crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(CRASH_ALIGN, CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX,
+ crash_size, CRASH_ALIGN);
Actually we could get rid of CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX altogether if we used
memblock_alloc_low() here (modulo the slight refactoring needed to accommodate
it).
Regards,
Nicolas