Re: [PATCH v8 02/14] mm/gup: check every subpage of a compound page during isolation
From: Joao Martins <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-03 13:24:45
Also in:
linux-kselftest, linux-mm, lkml
On 1/25/21 7:47 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
When pages are isolated in check_and_migrate_movable_pages() we skip
compound number of pages at a time. However, as Jason noted, it is
not necessary correct that pages[i] corresponds to the pages that
we skipped. This is because it is possible that the addresses in
this range had split_huge_pmd()/split_huge_pud(), and these functions
do not update the compound page metadata.
The problem can be reproduced if something like this occurs:
1. User faulted huge pages.
2. split_huge_pmd() was called for some reason
3. User has unmapped some sub-pages in the range
4. User tries to longterm pin the addresses.
The resulting pages[i] might end-up having pages which are not compound
size page aligned.
Fixes: aa712399c1e8 ("mm/gup: speed up check_and_migrate_cma_pages() on huge page")
Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
/* * If we get a page from the CMA zone, since we are going to * be pinning these entries, we might as well move them out@@ -1599,8 +1596,6 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, } } } - - i += step; }
With this, longterm gup will 'regress' for hugetlbfs e.g. from ~6k -> 32k usecs when pinning a 16G hugetlb file. Splitting can only occur on THP right? If so, perhaps we could retain the @step increment for compound pages but when !is_transparent_hugepage(head) or just PageHuge(head) like: + if (!is_transparent_hugepage(head) && PageCompound(page)) + i += (compound_nr(head) - (pages[i] - head)); Or making specific to hugetlbfs: + if (PageHuge(head)) + i += (compound_nr(head) - (pages[i] - head));