Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v16 4/9] mm: hugetlb: alloc the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page
From: Muchun Song <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-24 03:49:31
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 6:32 AM Oscar Salvador [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:41:28PM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote:quoted
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:50:05AM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote:quoted
quoted
CPU0: CPU1: set_compound_page_dtor(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR); memory_failure_hugetlb get_hwpoison_page __get_hwpoison_page get_page_unless_zero put_page_testzero() Maybe this can happen. But it is a very corner case. If we want to deal with this. We can put_page_testzero() first and then set_compound_page_dtor(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR).I have to check further, but it looks like this could actually happen. Handling this with VM_BUG_ON is wrong, because memory_failure/soft_offline are entitled to increase the refcount of the page. AFAICS, CPU0: CPU1: set_compound_page_dtor(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR); memory_failure_hugetlb get_hwpoison_page __get_hwpoison_page get_page_unless_zero put_page_testzero() identify_page_state me_huge_page I think we can reach me_huge_page with either refcount = 1 or refcount =2, depending whether put_page_testzero has been issued. For now, I would not re-enqueue the page if put_page_testzero == false. I have to see how this can be handled gracefully.I took a brief look. It is not really your patch fault. Hugetlb <-> memory-failure synchronization is a bit odd, it definitely needs improvment. The thing is, we can have different scenarios here. E.g: by the time we return from put_page_testzero, we might have refcount == 0 and PageHWPoison, or refcount == 1 PageHWPoison. The former will let a user get a page from the pool and get a sigbus when it faults in the page, and the latter will be even more odd as we will have a self-refcounted page in the free pool (and hwpoisoned).
I have been looking at the dequeue_huge_page_node_exact(). If a PageHWPoison huge page is in the free pool list, the page will not be allocated to the user. The PageHWPoison huge page will be skip in the dequeue_huge_page_node_exact().
quoted
As I said, it is not this patchset fault. I just made me realize this problem. I have to think some more about this.I have been thinking more about this. memory failure events can occur at any time, and we might not be in a position where we can handle gracefully the error, meaning that the page might end up in non desirable state. E.g: we could flag the page right before enqueing it. I still think that VM_BUG_ON should go, as the refcount can be perfectly increased by memory-failure/soft_offline handlers, so BUGing there does not make much sense.
Make sense. I will remove the VM_BUG_ON.
One think we could do is to check the state of the page we want to retrieve from the free hugepage pool. We should discard any HWpoisoned ones, and dissolve them. The thing is, memory-failure/soft_offline should allocate a new hugepage for the free pool, so keep the pool stable. Something like [1]. Anyway, this is orthogonal to this patch, and something I will work on soon. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210222135137.25717-2-osalvador@suse.de/T/#u (local)
Thanks for your efforts on this.
-- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3