Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2020-07-06

Re: [PATCH] Security: Documentation: fix: `make htmldocs` warnings

From: Puranjay Mohan <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-06 18:21:18
Also in: linux-kernel-mentees, lkml

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:44 PM Jonathan Corbet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon,  6 Jul 2020 23:30:10 +0530
Puranjay Mohan [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Remove extra ')' after function name to fix warnings.
It solves following warning :
WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'groups_sort)'
Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 11]

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <redacted>
---
 Documentation/security/credentials.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/security/credentials.rst b/Documentation/security/credentials.rst
index 282e79feee6a..d51e42b92395 100644
--- a/Documentation/security/credentials.rst
+++ b/Documentation/security/credentials.rst
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ When replacing the group list, the new list must be sorted before it
 is added to the credential, as a binary search is used to test for
 membership.  In practice, this means :c:func:`groups_sort` should be
 called before :c:func:`set_groups` or :c:func:`set_current_groups`.
-:c:func:`groups_sort)` must not be called on a ``struct group_list`` which
+:c:func:`groups_sort` must not be called on a ``struct group_list`` which
 is shared as it may permute elements as part of the sorting process
 even if the array is already sorted.
So this is a great fix, thanks for sending it.  That said, there are a
couple of ways in which this fix can be made even better:

 - The simpler of the two is to change the subject line of the patch.
   "Fix a warning" is almost never a good description of what you're
   doing; what you are actually doing is fixing a broken cross reference.
   So the subject line should say that.

 - In this case, though, there is a much better thing to do.  We
   deprecated the use of :c:func: around a year ago; the docs build system
   can now do the right thing automatically.  So a fix that would both
   eliminate the warning and improve the document as a whole would be to
   replace every instance of:

        :c:func:`function_name`

   with:

        function_name()

Is there any chance I could get you to send a patch that does that?
Yes! I have started working on it.
Thanks,

jon
Thanks,
Puranjay
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help