Re: [PATCH] trivial: fix kerneldoc comments
From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-23 09:34:51
Also in:
kernel-janitors, lkml
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 09:59:57AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/bcm/spu.c b/drivers/crypto/bcm/spu.c[]quoted
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ u32 spum_assoc_resp_len(enum spu_cipher_mode cipher_mode, * spu_aead_ivlen() - Calculate the length of the AEAD IV to be included * in a SPU request after the AAD and before the payload. * @cipher_mode: cipher mode - * @iv_ctr_len: initialization vector length in bytes + * @iv_len: initialization vector length in bytes * * In Linux ~4.2 and later, the assoc_data sg includes the IV. So no need * to include the IV as a separate field in the SPU request msg.@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ u16 spum_cipher_req_init(u8 *spu_hdr, struct spu_cipher_parms *cipher_parms) * setkey() time in spu_cipher_req_init(). * @spu_hdr: Start of the request message header (MH field) * @spu_req_hdr_len: Length in bytes of the SPU request header - * @isInbound: 0 encrypt, 1 decrypt + * @is_inbound: 0 encrypt, 1 decryptodd alignmentsSorry to have missed these.quoted
etc...Are there a lot of other such problems? I did look through the whole patch several times by hand, but perhaps it is just too big to see everything.
Probably the comments for spum_assoc_resp_len() could be tweaked. I had written an email about this one that Joe mentioned and spum_assoc_resp_len() but then I decided that it wasn't enough to worry about so I deleted the email instead of sending it. regards, dan carpenter