Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2020-06-23

Re: [PATCH] trivial: fix kerneldoc comments

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-23 09:34:51
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 09:59:57AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/bcm/spu.c b/drivers/crypto/bcm/spu.c
[]
quoted
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ u32 spum_assoc_resp_len(enum spu_cipher_mode cipher_mode,
  * spu_aead_ivlen() - Calculate the length of the AEAD IV to be included
  * in a SPU request after the AAD and before the payload.
  * @cipher_mode:  cipher mode
- * @iv_ctr_len:   initialization vector length in bytes
+ * @iv_len:   initialization vector length in bytes
  *
  * In Linux ~4.2 and later, the assoc_data sg includes the IV. So no need
  * to include the IV as a separate field in the SPU request msg.
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ u16 spum_cipher_req_init(u8 *spu_hdr, struct spu_cipher_parms *cipher_parms)
  * setkey() time in spu_cipher_req_init().
  * @spu_hdr:         Start of the request message header (MH field)
  * @spu_req_hdr_len: Length in bytes of the SPU request header
- * @isInbound:       0 encrypt, 1 decrypt
+ * @is_inbound:       0 encrypt, 1 decrypt
odd alignments
Sorry to have missed these.
quoted
etc...
Are there a lot of other such problems?  I did look through the whole
patch several times by hand, but perhaps it is just too big to see
everything.
Probably the comments for spum_assoc_resp_len() could be tweaked.

I had written an email about this one that Joe mentioned and
spum_assoc_resp_len() but then I decided that it wasn't enough to worry
about so I deleted the email instead of sending it.

regards,
dan carpenter
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help