On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:11:06 -0700
Eric Biggers [off-list ref] wrote:

Someone already sent out a fix for this:
https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-doc/52f851cb5c9fd2ecae97deec7e168e66b8c295c3.1591137229.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/

Is it intentional that you're sending out a different fix rather than applying
that one?

It wasn't, actually, I'm just finding myself more than usually challenged
these days.

That said, removing the table entirely seems ... excessive.  It's not
terrible the way it is, or we could make it:

	test_dummy_encryption[=%s]

if we really want to.

jon