Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: Properly mark the point of no return

Bernd Edlinger [off-list ref] writes:

On 3/5/20 10:15 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

quoted

@@ -1266,7 +1267,7 @@ int flush_old_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
 	 * Make sure we have a private signal table and that
 	 * we are unassociated from the previous thread group.
 	 */
-	retval = de_thread(current);
+	retval = de_thread(bprm, current);

can we get rid of passing current as parameter here?

With a separate patch.  It makes the patch less clear if I make that
change in this one.

Eric