Re: [PATCH RESEND v8 1/2] sched/numa: introduce per-cgroup NUMA locality info
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-02-21 15:28:52
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-02-21 15:28:52
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:23:52PM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
FYI, by monitoring locality, we found that the kvm vcpu thread is not covered by NUMA Balancing, whatever how many maximum period passed, the counters are not increasing, or very slowly, although inside guest we are copying memory. Later we found such task rarely exit to user space to trigger task work callbacks, and NUMA Balancing scan depends on that, which help us realize the importance to enable NUMA Balancing inside guest, with the correct NUMA topo, a big performance risk I'll say :-P
That's a bug in KVM, see: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801143657.785902257@linutronix.de https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801143657.887648487@linutronix.de ISTR there being newer versions of that patch-set, but I can't seem to find them in a hurry.