Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Introduce Data Access MONitor (DAMON)
From: Qian Cai <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-28 11:20:33
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Qian Cai <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-28 11:20:33
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Jan 28, 2020, at 5:50 AM, sjpark@amazon.com wrote: For the comments from perf maintainers, I added Steven Rostedt and Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo first, but I might missed someone. If you recommend some more people, I will add them to recipients. I made DAMON as a new subsystem because I think no existing subsystem fits well to be a base of DAMON, due to DAMON's unique goals and mechanisms described below in the original cover letter. The existing subsystem that most similar to DAMON might be 'mm/page_idle.c'. However, there are many conceptual differences with DAMON. One biggest difference I think is the target. 'page_idle' deals with physical page frames while DAMON deals with virtual address of specific processes. Nevertheless, if you have some different opinion, please let me know.
I thought everyone should know to go to the MAINTAINERS file and search PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM. It might be difficult but there is a perf subcommand for some subsystems like sched: tracing/measuring of scheduler actions and latencies.