On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 13:51:13 +0100
Marc Zyngier [off-list ref] wrote:

[forgot that one]

On Fri,  2 Aug 2019 15:50:14 +0100
Steven Price [off-list ref] wrote:

[...]

quoted

+static int __init kvm_pvtime_init(void)
+{
+	kvm_register_device_ops(&pvtime_ops, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PV_TIME);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+late_initcall(kvm_pvtime_init);

Why is it an initcall? So far, the only initcall we've used is the one
that initializes KVM itself. Can't we just the device_ops just like we
do for the vgic?

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.