Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-15 13:30:22)

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:24 PM Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-12 01:17:28)

quoted

diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
index 571e4c65deb5c..f165c9d8e10b0 100644

quoted

One solution would be to piggyback on all the existing devres allocation
logic we already have and make each struct kunit a device that we pass
into the devres functions. A far simpler solution would be to just
copy/paste what devres does and use a spinlock and an allocation
function that takes GFP flags.

Yeah, that's what I did originally, but I thought from the discussion
on patch 01 that you thought a spinlock was overkill for struct kunit.
I take it you only meant in that initial patch?

Correct. I was only talking about the success bit in there.