On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 4:05 AM Greg KH [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 12:50:53PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 04:01:09PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:

quoted

## TLDR

I rebased the last patchset on 5.1-rc7 in hopes that we can get this in
5.2.

That might be rushing it, normally trees are already closed now for
5.2-rc1 if 5.1-final comes out this Sunday.

quoted

Shuah, I think you, Greg KH, and myself talked off thread, and we agreed
we would merge through your tree when the time came? Am I remembering
correctly?

No objection from me.

Let me go review the latest round of patches now.

Overall, looks good to me, and provides a framework we can build on.
I'm a bit annoyed at the reliance on uml at the moment, but we can work
on that in the future :)

Eh, I mostly fixed that.

I removed the KUnit framework's reliance on UML i.e. the actual tests
now run on any architecture.

The only UML dependent bit is the KUnit wrapper scripts, which could
be made to work to support other architectures pretty trivially. The
only limitation here is that it would be dependent on the actual
workflow you are using.

In anycase, if you are comfortable reading the results in the kernel
logs, then there is no dependence on UML. (I should probably provide
some documentation on that...)

Thanks for sticking with this, now the real work begins...

I don't doubt it.

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Does this cover all the patches in this set?

Thanks!