Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 7 authors, 2019-02-28

Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86 topology: Add CPUID.1F multi-die/package support

From: Like Xu <hidden>
Date: 2019-02-25 05:31:49
Also in: lkml

On 2019/2/24 18:04, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 19/02/2019 à 04:40, Len Brown a écrit :
quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index ccd1f2a8e557..4250a87f57db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ static bool match_smt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
  		int cpu1 = c->cpu_index, cpu2 = o->cpu_index;
  
  		if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
+		    c->cpu_die_id == o->cpu_die_id &&
  		    per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu1) == per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu2)) {
  			if (c->cpu_core_id == o->cpu_core_id)
  				return topology_sane(c, o, "smt");
@@ -404,6 +405,7 @@ static bool match_smt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
  		}
  
  	} else if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
+		   c->cpu_die_id == o->cpu_die_id &&
  		   c->cpu_core_id == o->cpu_core_id) {
  		return topology_sane(c, o, "smt");
  	}
@@ -461,7 +463,7 @@ static bool match_llc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
   */
  static bool match_die(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
  {
-	if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id)
+	if (c->cpu_die_id == o->cpu_die_id)
  		return true;
  	return false;
  }
Hello Len,

I am testing your patches in a VM with CPUID.1f QEMU patches (author Like Xu is CC'ed),
booted to get 2 packages with 1 NUMA node each and 2 dies each:

-smp cpus=16,threads=2,cores=2,dies=2,sockets=2 -numa node,cpus=0-7,nodeid=0 -numa node,cpus=8-15,nodeid=1

sysfs files expose wrong information:
core_siblings contains threads of the local die AND of die with same number in other processors,
eg cpu 0-3 and 8-11 instead of 0-3 only.

The issue is that you seem to assume that die ids will always be unique across multiple packages.
I don't think the intel MCP topolohgy has this global uniqueness 
assumption for die_id according to CPUID.1F SDM.
Is this a valid assumption? If so, QEMU patches should be fixed.
If not, I fixed the issue by changing match_die() to check both phys_proc_id and cpu_die_id:

static bool match_die(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
{
	if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id && c->cpu_die_id == o->cpu_die_id)
  		return true;
	return false;
}

Thanks
Brice

  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help