Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: Add support for DT binding schema checks
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-12-11 15:12:32
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-kbuild, linuxppc-dev, lkml
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:39 PM Masahiro Yamada [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Rob, On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 5:50 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This adds the build infrastructure for checking DT binding schema documents and validating dts files using the binding schema. Check DT binding schema documents: make dt_binding_check Build dts files and check using DT binding schema: make dtbs_check Optionally, DT_SCHEMA_FILES can passed in with a schema file(s) to usePerhaps, "can be passed" ?
Yes. [...]
quoted
+quiet_cmd_chk_binding = CHKDT $<In convention, the short log displays the target name instead of the prerequisite.
Yes, but here there is no target. We're just running a check on the source.
If O=foo/bar is given, $< shows the full path, then log will look like follows: CHKDT /home/masahiro/ref/linux-devicetree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/calxeda.yaml DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/calxeda.example.dtb CHKDT /home/masahiro/ref/linux-devicetree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.example.dtb CHKDT /home/masahiro/ref/linux-devicetree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xilinx.yaml DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xilinx.example.dtb CHKDT /home/masahiro/ref/linux-devicetree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/nspire.yaml DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/nspire.example.dtb CHKDT /home/masahiro/ref/linux-devicetree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/ti,davinci.yaml DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/ti,davinci.example.dtb CHKDT /home/masahiro/ref/linux-devicetree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml You might think it is ugly.
I've changed it to this: quiet_cmd_chk_binding = CHKDT $(patsubst $(srctree)/%,%,$<) [...]
quoted
+$(obj)/%.example.dts: $(src)/%.yaml FORCE + $(call if_changed,chk_binding) + +DT_TMP_SCHEMA := .schema.yaml.tmpBTW, why does this file start with a period? What is the meaning of '.tmp' extension?
Nothing really. Just named it something so it gets cleaned and ignored by git.
quoted
+extra-y += $(DT_TMP_SCHEMA) + +quiet_cmd_mk_schema = SCHEMA $@ + cmd_mk_schema = mkdir -p $(obj); \ + rm -f $@; \ + $(DT_MK_SCHEMA) $(DT_MK_SCHEMA_FLAGS) -o $@ $(filter-out FORCE, $^)"mkdir -p $(obj)" is redundant. Why is 'rm -f $@' necessary ? Can't dt-mk-schema overwrite the output file?
It is for error case when the output file is not generated. I can handle this within dt-mk-schema instead.
quoted
+DT_DOCS = $(shell cd $(srctree)/$(src) && find * -name '*.yaml') +DT_SCHEMA_FILES ?= $(addprefix $(src)/,$(DT_DOCS)) + +extra-y += $(patsubst $(src)/%.yaml,%.example.dts, $(DT_SCHEMA_FILES)) +extra-y += $(patsubst $(src)/%.yaml,%.example.dtb, $(DT_SCHEMA_FILES))I assume you intentionally did not do like this: extra-y += $(patsubst %.yaml,%.example.dtb, $(DT_DOCS)) From the commit description, DT_SCHEMA_FILES might be overridden by a user. So, I think this is OK.quoted
+$(obj)/$(DT_TMP_SCHEMA): | $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(patsubst $(src)/%.yaml,%.example.dtb, $(DT_SCHEMA_FILES)))I do not understand this line. Why is it necessary? *.example.dtb files are generated anyway since they are listed in extra-y.
It is enforcing the ordering. Without it, the binding checks and building .schema.yaml.tmp happen in parallel because both only have the source files as dependencies. The '|' keeps the dependencies out of the dependency list($^). [...]
quoted
+cmd_dtc_yaml_chk = \ + if ! echo "/dts-v1/; /{};" | $(DTC) -I dts -O yaml > /dev/null ; then \ + echo "*"; \ + echo "* dtc needs libyaml for DT schema validation support."; \ + echo "* Install the necessary libyaml development package from your distro."; \ + echo "*"; \ + false; \ + fi; \ + touch $@ + +$(objtree)/scripts/dtc/.dtc-yaml-chk.tmp: $(DTC) FORCE + $(call if_changed,dtc_yaml_chk)Hmm, this is kind of ugly. I'd rather check this in scripts/dtc/Makefile How about something like below?
Looks good.
ifeq ($(wildcard /usr/include/yaml.h),) +ifeq ($(CHECK_DTBS),1)
I'm going to change this to "ifneq ($CHECK_DTBS),)" in case we start supporting more than 1 value such as warning levels.
+$(error dtc needs libyaml for DT schema validation support. \ + Install the necessary libyaml development package.) +endif HOST_EXTRACFLAGS += -DNO_YAML else dtc-objs += yamltree.o One drawback of this approach is, this is not checked if you are using out-of-tree DTC. Probably, Rob is the only person that overrides DTC.
Sadly, that's probably true. Thanks for your thorough review. Rob