Thread (18 messages) read the whole thread 18 messages, 2 authors, 2018-11-06

Re: [PATCH v6 13/14] Documentation/x86: Rename and update intel_rdt_ui.txt

From: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
Date: 2018-11-06 19:05:51
Also in: lkml

Hi Matthew,

On 11/6/18 11:41 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:53:05AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
quoted
quoted
-This feature is enabled by the CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Kconfig and the
-X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits:
+This feature is enabled by the CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Kconfig(for Intel) or
+CONFIG_AMD_QOS(for AMD) and the X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits:
Now I'm curious why we have two different Kconfig options for the same
feature.  I should go and read the other patches, I suppose.
Now that I've read through them, I find nowhere that the choices:

AMQ_QOS=y INTEL_RDT=n
AMD_QOS=n INTEL_RDT=y
AMD_QOS=y INTEL_RDT=y

have any difference to the resulting code.  Thus, this looks like a
vanity config option; please don't do this.  Rename the config option
to be vendor-neutral if you must, but please no new options unless
absolutely necessary.
Yes. That is right. Code does not change with any of these combinations.
We can go with only one neutral parameter which is config RESCTRL. I will
remove AMD_QOS and INTEL_RDT. This also requires some text changes to
cover both Intel and AMD. Will send the updated patches.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help