Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2018-10-15

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Documentation: intel_pstate: Add base_frequency information

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-10-15 08:53:39
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-pm, lkml

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 6:44 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Updated documentation to explain base_frequency attribute.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst
index 8f1d3de449b5..14a5505e073e 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst
@@ -465,6 +465,10 @@ Next, the following policy attributes have special meaning if
        policy for the time interval between the last two invocations of the
        driver's utilization update callback by the CPU scheduler for that CPU.

+``base_frequency``
+       When present, shows the base frequency of the CPU. Any frequency above
+       this will be in the turbo frequency range.
+
This isn't entirely correct, because base_frequency is not present in
the passive mode (and it is not present for the other drivers for that
matter).
 The meaning of these attributes in the `passive mode <Passive Mode_>`_ is the
 same as for other scaling drivers.
Instead, I would say:

"One more policy attribute is present if the `HWP feature is enabled
in the processor <Active Mode With HWP_>`_:"

here and I would add the description of the attribute below.

Thanks,
Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help