Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2018-12-03
STALE2774d REVIEWED: 2 (0M)

[PATCH 2/2] docs/core-api: memory-hotplug: add some details about locking internals

From: Mike Rapoport <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-11 04:58:35
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: documentation, memory hot(un)plug, the rest · Maintainers: Jonathan Corbet, David Hildenbrand, Oscar Salvador, Linus Torvalds

From: David Hildenbrand <redacted>

Let's document the magic a bit, especially why device_hotplug_lock is
required when adding/removing memory and how it all play together with
requests to online/offline memory from user space.

[ rppt: moved the text to Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst ]

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-7-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <redacted>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <redacted>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <redacted>
Cc: John Allen <redacted>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <redacted>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <redacted>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <redacted>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michael Neuling <redacted>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <redacted>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <redacted>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <redacted>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <redacted>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <redacted>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <redacted>
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <redacted>
---
 Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst b/Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst
index a99f2f2..de7467e 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst
@@ -85,3 +85,41 @@ MEM_ONLINE, or MEM_OFFLINE action to cancel hotplugging. It stops
 further processing of the notification queue.
 
 NOTIFY_STOP stops further processing of the notification queue.
+
+Locking Internals
+=================
+
+When adding/removing memory that uses memory block devices (i.e. ordinary RAM),
+the device_hotplug_lock should be held to:
+
+- synchronize against online/offline requests (e.g. via sysfs). This way, memory
+  block devices can only be accessed (.online/.state attributes) by user
+  space once memory has been fully added. And when removing memory, we
+  know nobody is in critical sections.
+- synchronize against CPU hotplug and similar (e.g. relevant for ACPI and PPC)
+
+Especially, there is a possible lock inversion that is avoided using
+device_hotplug_lock when adding memory and user space tries to online that
+memory faster than expected:
+
+- device_online() will first take the device_lock(), followed by
+  mem_hotplug_lock
+- add_memory_resource() will first take the mem_hotplug_lock, followed by
+  the device_lock() (while creating the devices, during bus_add_device()).
+
+As the device is visible to user space before taking the device_lock(), this
+can result in a lock inversion.
+
+onlining/offlining of memory should be done via device_online()/
+device_offline() - to make sure it is properly synchronized to actions
+via sysfs. Holding device_hotplug_lock is advised (to e.g. protect online_type)
+
+When adding/removing/onlining/offlining memory or adding/removing
+heterogeneous/device memory, we should always hold the mem_hotplug_lock in
+write mode to serialise memory hotplug (e.g. access to global/zone
+variables).
+
+In addition, mem_hotplug_lock (in contrast to device_hotplug_lock) in read
+mode allows for a quite efficient get_online_mems/put_online_mems
+implementation, so code accessing memory can protect from that memory
+vanishing.
-- 
2.7.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help