[PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Fix missing updates of bitmap index
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-09-23 23:52:41
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-i2c, linux-iio, linux-mmc, linux-samsung-soc, linux-serial, lkml, netdev
Subsystem:
gpio subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Linus Walleij, Bartosz Golaszewski, Linus Torvalds
In new code introduced by commit b17566a6b08b ("gpiolib: Implement fast
processing path in get/set array"), bitmap index is not updated with
next found zero bit position as it should while skipping over pins
already processed via fast bitmap path, possibly resulting in an
infinite loop. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index a53d17745d21..7d9536a79a66 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c@@ -2880,8 +2880,8 @@ int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep, __set_bit(hwgpio, mask); if (array_info) - find_next_zero_bit(array_info->get_mask, - array_size, i); + i = find_next_zero_bit(array_info->get_mask, + array_size, i); else i++; } while ((i < array_size) &&
@@ -2905,7 +2905,8 @@ int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep, trace_gpio_value(desc_to_gpio(desc), 1, value); if (array_info) - find_next_zero_bit(array_info->get_mask, i, j); + j = find_next_zero_bit(array_info->get_mask, i, + j); else j++; }
@@ -3192,8 +3193,8 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep, } if (array_info) - find_next_zero_bit(array_info->set_mask, - array_size, i); + i = find_next_zero_bit(array_info->set_mask, + array_size, i); else i++; } while ((i < array_size) &&
--
2.16.4