On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:47:30 +0300
Mike Rapoport [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

So this seems like good stuff overall.  It digs pretty deeply into the mm
code, though, so I'm a little reluctant to apply it without an ack from an
mm developer.  Alternatively, I'm happy to step back if Andrew wants to
pick the set up.  

Jon, does Michal's reply [1] address your concerns?
Or should I respin and ask Andrew to pick it up? 

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180712080006.GA328@dhcp22.suse.cz/ (local)

Michal acked #11 (the docs patch) in particular but not the series as a
whole.  But it's the rest of the series that I was most worried about :)
I'm happy for the patches to take either path, but I'd really like an
explicit ack before I apply that many changes directly to the MM code...

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html