On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:

Hi,

This is a follow-up on the discussion started in [1].

Applies on -rcu/dev.

Cheers,
  Andrea

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529918258-7295-1-git-send-email-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com

Andrea Parri (3):
  sched: Use smp_mb() in wake_woken_function()
  locking: Clarify requirements for smp_mb__after_spinlock()
  doc: Update wake_up() & co. memory-barrier guarantees

What is the plan for this series?

We are currently discussing locking changes that might affect 2/3, but
I'd still consider this patch and the overall series as an improvement
over the current status (1/3 is a fix to the code) and I'd really like
future changes to be based on this series...

I expected this series to go via "-rcu -> tip -> ..."; 2/3 had Peter's
Ack, but 1/3 and 3/3 are missing any comments (or tags): please let me
know if any action on the series is required from me (the series still
applies on the latest "dev" branch of -rcu).

  Andrea

 Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/sched.h             |  4 +--
 include/linux/spinlock.h          | 25 ++----------------
 kernel/sched/completion.c         |  8 +++---
 kernel/sched/core.c               | 30 +++++++++------------
 kernel/sched/wait.c               | 55 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 6 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html